visual hierarchy: i feel the most comfortable with visual hierarchy. from the second design brief to fourth, i think i've made the most progress in this area. in my final handout of maso's work there was absolutely no visual hierarchy. but since then, my drafts have gradually progressed to a point where i think the visual hierarchy is pretty clear.
repetition: i also feel comfortable with repetition. i understand that too much repetition can look a little obvious and tacky and just enough balance can pull a layout together.
contrast: contrast can make important elements stand out. i think contrast is another thing that should have a balance. too much contrast can be loud and tacky, while a good amount of contrast can make a design simple yet still interesting.
transparency: i'm not completely sure i understand what is meant by transparency. i know that messing with the transparency in photos and layering them in photoshop can make interesting elements. besides that i'm not sure.
audience: again i feel like i have to compare my current work to design brief #2. i don't think i really considered the audience in either of those designs. as for the poem, my design was difficult to read and the audience would obviously want to read the poem. and the form, i think maybe all the lines would make the form a little stressful to fill out, like the need to stay within the lines would be irritating. in the next design brief, i really thought about the audience and i researched the dance and tried to pick a photo that was reminiscent of the museum exposition that was mentioned in the flyer. i tried to design the flyer with those aspects in mind so the audience would want to read the flyer.
layers
unity
choice of typeface: i think i'm still having a little trouble with picking typefaces. pretty much every time that i email a design to my friends, one of their most common criticisms is with the typeface. i have learned from this criticism though, for example.. i thought papyrus was simple enough to use along a scripty typeface... and in the feedback i got... it's clearly not. since then i've tried to use only the most basic and simple typefaces in blocks of text and more elaborate typefaces in headings. i've also completely ruled out scripty typeface, because someone in class said they looked amateurish.
alignment: i think i may have always been comfortable with alignment, but maybe this class has taken that to a new level. i've always understood that alignment on the sides is a must, but from the brief #3 i learned that alignment throughout the page can pull the design together.
proximity
presentation
figure & ground
shelley's buh-lawg
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Thursday, October 28, 2010
my revisions
in my first flyer (with the two boxes) i mostly changed the bottom section because i still really like the top, with the picture and the title and the little bit of text. i moved the boxes around because someone told me it was hard to know where to start reading. so i moved the condensed the three sections of text into one section and placed it right under the photo in the upper left corner so it'd be obvious to start there. i wanted all of the top stuff to be seen as one element, so after that top section, the eye moves to the block of text, and then on to the two boxes.
i was told that my second flyer (with danceworks across the center) was hard to understand because everything had equal weight. again, i condensed the text on the right side and spread it across the bottom, and moved the times up to the right corner under the picture. i also removed the stripe because i thought it looked too much like a racing stripe.
the final flyer has turned in to my favorite, which is kinda cool because i made it at the last second just to have a third version! i was told that the white box of text was competing with the black boxes and the picture, so i manipulated the picture to make it whiter and deleted the black boxes. i was also told that the "trapped white space" was distracting. i had trouble fixing that problem because if i left open space it was distracting, but if i made the text boxes bigger it all had equal weight. i'm really happy with this revision, the only part that's still kinda bothering me is the dates and times, but i do think they complete the visual path nicely.
i was told that my second flyer (with danceworks across the center) was hard to understand because everything had equal weight. again, i condensed the text on the right side and spread it across the bottom, and moved the times up to the right corner under the picture. i also removed the stripe because i thought it looked too much like a racing stripe.
the final flyer has turned in to my favorite, which is kinda cool because i made it at the last second just to have a third version! i was told that the white box of text was competing with the black boxes and the picture, so i manipulated the picture to make it whiter and deleted the black boxes. i was also told that the "trapped white space" was distracting. i had trouble fixing that problem because if i left open space it was distracting, but if i made the text boxes bigger it all had equal weight. i'm really happy with this revision, the only part that's still kinda bothering me is the dates and times, but i do think they complete the visual path nicely.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
design brief #3
i have two major concerns with this assignment. the first concern is the amount of text we need to fit on the flyer, it's a lot! also i started to play around on photoshop today and it's really difficult! can we continue to use indesign or illustrator?
reading about type
all of this information was very new for me, from what the word "color" means, to leading (pronunciation, how it can be changed, that's it's a real thing...), to the different families, everything was new.
i really enjoyed the historical tidbits of upper case and lower case letters, and how the romans had to chip the letters in to stone and so created serifs.
i also found it interesting that "modern" fonts look way less modern than the oldstyle fonts.
my favorite reading was the "designing with type" page. the three c's; concord, conflict, and contrast are all discussed and explained, but contrast seems to be the most important c. contrast creates interest and makes people want to read more. the strategies to create contrast are pretty simple and will probably be useful in most-- if not all--of the rest of our assignments.
i really enjoyed the historical tidbits of upper case and lower case letters, and how the romans had to chip the letters in to stone and so created serifs.
i also found it interesting that "modern" fonts look way less modern than the oldstyle fonts.
my favorite reading was the "designing with type" page. the three c's; concord, conflict, and contrast are all discussed and explained, but contrast seems to be the most important c. contrast creates interest and makes people want to read more. the strategies to create contrast are pretty simple and will probably be useful in most-- if not all--of the rest of our assignments.
design brief #2
it was really difficult finalizing my designs without any feedback from the class. i don't the either the handout or the form changed much from my first draft to my final draft.... well there were lots of little changes. but no major differences. i'm thinking that's probably not good. in the end though, i'm still happy with my final designs, but i would have felt more confident throughout the process with more feedback.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







